I'm Stephanie and i love films, here i will post spoiler-free reviews!
Showing posts with label adaptation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label adaptation. Show all posts

Friday, 28 February 2014

THE BOOK THIEF


The Book Thief is one of my all time favourite books, and when I heard that it was being turned into a film I was apprehensive - how could it work? Could cinema truly capture the soul and heart of Markus Zusak's bestselling novel?

I first watched The Book Thief last year at a press screening, with a friend who had also read and enjoyed the book. Both of us absolutely loved the film, which is why I went to another screening a week ago. This time I went with two different friends who had also read the book and one who had not. Again, we all loved it and left the cinema emotionally moved and singing the film's praises.

You might ask why I am starting my review with these seemingly mundane details, but the reason is simple; I have seen too many negative reviews of this film. Each one has referenced how it is an adaptation of Zusak's brilliant book but I am lead to believe that not a single one of those critics had read Zusak's brilliant book, because as far as adaptations go The Book Thief is faultless.

Criticism has been thrown at the film for not depicting the war enough, for the image of war being too white-washed, how the story doesn't seem dramatic enough. Well, that is the crux of Zusak's novel; it is the  telling of World War II when following a young German girl called Liesel (Sophie Nelisse). The story is not and has not ever been about war, it is all about Liesel. So if you were going into this film, or the book, with the expectation seeing emaciated bodies in Nazi-driven concentration camps then I'm afraid your expectations will not be met and you can stop reading now. Instead, The Book Thief is a heartwarming and charming story of one girls experiences throughout the war whilst living with foster parents in a small German town.

Now that I have got that out of the way, read on for my five star review.



The Book Thief is narrated by Death (Roger Allam) himself and follows Liesel, a young girl who is sent to live with a foster family during World War II. Liesel finds solace from the brutal reality of war by indulging in stolen books and sharing them with others. However, when Max (Ben Schnetzer), a Jew, comes to Liesel's foster family for sanctuary and protection, Liesel's life changes forever.

Markus Zusak's story is innovative and inspiring and has beautifully re-created by director Brian Percival for the big screen. The aesthetics alone are hauntingly beautiful; a snow-covered, war-torn German village that perfectly encompasses the scenery described by Zusak in the book. The perfectly cast characters allow the audience to immerse themselves fully into the story of Liesel's life and root for her the entire way.


Aged just 13 years old in their feature debut, Sophie Nelisse and Nico Liersch, who plays Liesel's best friend Rudy, are outstanding as the protagonists. Nelisse plays the complex character of a feisty yet heartbroken girl who has lost everything in the war and she leads the film with a charm and charisma that is second-to-none. Her relationship with Max, the hidden Jew, is perhaps the most important element of the story and she plays it with such tender emotion it is impossible for your heart not to ache as she tries to bring the outside world to the confines of the basement where he is hiding.

Emily Watson also shines as Liesel's stern but devoted foster mother, Rose; perfectly portraying her character's many layers by maintaing a strict and brash exterior whilst keeping it clear that she loves both Liesel and her husband Hans more than anything. However, Hans is arguably the star of the show; played by the brilliant Geoffrey Rush he is perhaps one of the most beloved book characters of the last 10 years and Rush, with the help of Percival, somehow manages to add even more warmth and charm to his live-action counterpart in a flawless embodiment of the character. In particular, Hans relationship with Liesel is nothing short of heart-warming and will have you both laughing and crying throughout as you desperately will for nothing bad to happen to either of them.

In addition to the lovable characters and heart-breaking narrative, the most captivating aspect of The Book Thief comes from its narrator: Death. Prominent throughout the film in the form of an elusive voiceover, he offers great perspective as, in his own words, nobody served the Fuhrer as loyally as he during the war. Death's fascination with Liesel is the crux of the story and leads to his conclusion that after following Liesel's life so intimately he is in fact haunted by humans.

As mentioned before, the critics who have been slating the film make it obvious that they had not only failed to read the book but they also failed to research the story to know what they were going into. You do not need to read the book in order to enjoy the film, that is a fact. However, I would say that you need to know going in that this is not your typical war film, so if you are expecting brutality and disturbing shocks, you will be left disappointed.

In reality, when a best-selling book is adapted into a film it very rarely goes so right. The combination of a breathtaking cast, astounding direction and author Markus Zusak's incredible narrative, The Book Thief is the one to watch for 2014. Emotionally charged and beautifully told, it will capture your hearts within moments.



The Book Thief is in cinemas nationwide now!

An interview with the cast of The Book Thief.


Stay tuned for more reviews and follow me on twitter if you fancy it :)

Love,

Friday, 18 October 2013

ROMEO & JULIET


Needless to say, this 2013 remake of Romeo & Juliet was not high on my list of 'must-see' films, in fact I had scarcely even heard of it and its forgettable trailer and z-list cast made me wonder exactly what I was letting myself in for when I went along to the cinema on Tuesday night.

Directed by Carlo Carlei, this film is simply yet another rework of Shakespeare's classic play about two star-crossed lovers Romeo & Juliet. In case you live under a rock, a brief summary of the plot: Romeo (Douglas Booth) and Juliet (Hailee Steinfield) are on opposing sides of a long-standing feud between two families. However, when they meet at a masquerade ball they immediately fall in love and marry in secret - however, tragedy soon ensues.

Carlei can not compete with the 1996 masterpiece
The story has been made into film countless times - from the traditional to the animated to the outrageous but perhaps the most prominent interpretation comes from the Baz Luhrmann's 1996 masterpiece Romeo + Juliet, starring Leonardo Dicaprio. Unsurprisingly, Carlei's version doesn't even come close to the levels of Luhrmann's brilliance.

I suppose the most important point to mention is that Carlei has stuck to the more traditional depiction of the story. There are sword fights, they are in 'fair Verona', there are no fights at petrol stations nor any murder on the beach. One criticism that I can't understand is that it 'bastardizes Shakespeare' - this film holds the closest imitation of the actual play from any of the films that were made this side of the 1970s (sadly the 'Do you bite your thumb at me, sir?' debate was mercilessly cut), although the 1996 version is the stronger film by miles, if either of the two were to be accused of bastardizing Shakespeare, I would have thought it'd be the that one.

Despite sticking to the language of the play and paying homage to traditional Shakespeare, the incredibly weak cast are the huge downfall of this film. Reminiscent of a bad school play, it was clear that much of the cast - namely Hailee Steinfield who was unfortunately one of the leads - simply memorized their lines but didn't bother to look into the meaning of the words. It was obvious that they did not understand this old English language of which they were speaking and it made for awkward, emotionless and confused dialogue being recited in a way that can only be described as cringe-inducing.

Surprisingly, aside from our Juliet, the most painful performance came from Damian Lewis who floundered as Juliet's dad. A performance so bad that it actually defied belief as he over-acted his way through the two-hour film, trumping any other bad performance within the film almost as though the actors were secretly in competition for the title of Worst Actor.

Most of the cast seemed to be competing for the title of 'Worst Actor'
The only shred of acting capability came from Douglas Booth as Romeo. Still not the strongest of performances and he definitely doesn't have the charm and loveability that DiCaprio brought to the character in 1996, but he at least appeared to understand the lines that he was reciting and he managed to have a slither of believable passion as a character, which is more than can be said for anybody else.

Let's be honest, the film was clearly on a tight budget - this was proven by the fact you could see the actor's breath as they spoke throughout most of the indoors scenes as they were clearly freezing on set -, the cast were amateurish and the entire thing felt a bit clunky and awkward. However, it was still watchable and I have to say I have certainly seen much worse films this year. As a traditional re-telling of the classic play, it is a good adaptation; it sticks to the original script and transports you back to the time of which it was set. It is just a shame that the cast made this feel more like an awkward High School play than one of the most renowned pieces of fiction  to exist.

All in all I award Romeo & Juliet: ★✯☆☆☆

Stay tuned for more reviews and follow me on twitter if you fancy it :)

Love,