Over this awards season i have really grown to love Ben Affleck and his
scraggly beard. Sure, before i had always kind of liked the guy - after
all we do have him and Matt Damon to thank for one of the greatest
film's of all time: Good Will Hunting - and he seemed decent enough as a
person but not many of his films really struck me as anything special
so i never had a real passion for him. However, seeing his reaction to
winning the prestigious Best Director BAFTA combined with his beautiful
wife Jennifer Garner's reaction as she practically burst with pride as
her hubby took to the stage with his acceptance speech...It made it hard
not to fall in love with them as a couple and want him to succeed even
more so that we could be treated to some more adorable displays of pride
and affection.
Jennifer Garner after husband Ben Affleck is announced as the Best Director winner |
So when the Oscar's came around i had everything crossed that Ben Affleck and Argo would win big and was probably almost as proud as Jen was when Argo was announced as 2013's Best Picture.
(Oh, to be clear as a sidenote i hadn't actually seen Argo by this point, this is a minor factor.)
I've never really held the Oscar's decisions in high regard. After the monstrosity of 1999 where Shakespeare in Love beat Life is Beautiful to the Best Picture Oscar whilst American History X wasn't even nominated... I kind of just gave up on the award nonsense then. I already knew that the 2013 Oscar's weren't doing much better than 1999 with awarding the most deserving nominee after Jennifer Lawrence won Best Actress for Silver Linings Playbook over the absolutely incredible, out of this World performance from six-year-old Quvenzhane Wallis in Beasts of the Southern Wild. I get angry about this particular injustice every day and with such examples i ironically didn't have heightened expectations of Argo, despite it's Oscar win.
I finally got round to watching Argo last week and even though i wasn't expecting anything terrific i was still slightly disappointed. Ben's scraggly beard had let me down and i really wasn't prepared for that! Don't get me wrong, the most frustrating thing about Argo is that it isn't bad... It just isn't... good. As the true life story of how America rescued a group of hostages from Iran by pretending they are filming a Hollywood movie, Argo,... I kind of expected a bit more action? As i said in my last post, i am not the kind of person who needs big explosions and drama to enjoy a film but not a lot really seemed to happen in Argo. A basic plot summary would be:(Oh, to be clear as a sidenote i hadn't actually seen Argo by this point, this is a minor factor.)
I've never really held the Oscar's decisions in high regard. After the monstrosity of 1999 where Shakespeare in Love beat Life is Beautiful to the Best Picture Oscar whilst American History X wasn't even nominated... I kind of just gave up on the award nonsense then. I already knew that the 2013 Oscar's weren't doing much better than 1999 with awarding the most deserving nominee after Jennifer Lawrence won Best Actress for Silver Linings Playbook over the absolutely incredible, out of this World performance from six-year-old Quvenzhane Wallis in Beasts of the Southern Wild. I get angry about this particular injustice every day and with such examples i ironically didn't have heightened expectations of Argo, despite it's Oscar win.
- The hostages are captured
- The CIA wonder how they can free them
- Ben Affleck suggests the fake movie
- They get to work on the fake movie
- Ben Affleck goes to Iran
- Ben Affleck frees the hostages
- A bit of drama at the airport
- The hostages arrive home and are safe
I don't know about you but i just expected a little more action inbetween points 5 and 6, it all seemed way too easy. The scenes towards the end of the film where they are in the airport trying to get through security without being identified as the hostages were great, i will hand Affleck that. They were really high tension, even if they weren't high drama and the tension is more than satisfactory for a film of this stance but twenty minutes of tension from a two hour film is most definitely not satisfactory for the film as a whole and nowhere near enough to carry the rest of the boring film.
I know this was based on a true story and for all i know maybe they did get the hostages that easily, with that little drama or confrontation. But since when has Hollywood been wary of dramatizing and exaggerating true stories?! Argo has already faced criticism from Canada and Iran for it's distortion of the truth so it isn't as though they were desperate to maintain complete accuracy... There just could have been something more.
I know this was based on a true story and for all i know maybe they did get the hostages that easily, with that little drama or confrontation. But since when has Hollywood been wary of dramatizing and exaggerating true stories?! Argo has already faced criticism from Canada and Iran for it's distortion of the truth so it isn't as though they were desperate to maintain complete accuracy... There just could have been something more.
It was well directed though. The story was boring but the direction can't be faulted i guess.
I award Argo ★★★☆☆ because, as i said, it wasn't bad. It just wasn't good.
I award Argo ★★★☆☆ because, as i said, it wasn't bad. It just wasn't good.
Stay tuned for more things film and follow me on Twitter if you fancy it :)
Love,
No comments:
Post a Comment
What do you think? Leave your comments below!